Verified fix
The original code failed, and the fixed version then ran without errors.
AI code debugging with execution-based verification
APReason helps you investigate bugs, reproduce failures, execute proposed fixes in a sandbox, and compare the results with a clear code diff. Know what passed the test — and what still needs work.
A suggested fix can look right and still fail the moment you run it. Without running the code, an assistant is predicting what will happen. APReason tests the fix against your actual failure and shows you the result, including when it doesn't pass.
Predicted fix
Code is suggested. You find out if it works when you run it yourself.
Execution-checked fix
The failure is reproduced, the fix is run, and the outcome is shown with a diff.
Your original code runs exactly as given, so the real error and traceback are captured instead of guessed.
APReason reads the real failure and explains the likely causes before proposing a change.
The proposed fix runs in the same sandbox, against the same reproduction.
You get the real error, a before → after diff, and the output of the fixed run.
This Python snippet and its output are reproducible: run it yourself and you will get the same error. The layout mirrors the verification card APReason shows above its explanation; file paths are shortened.
def average(nums):
return sum(nums) / len(nums)
print(average([]))Traceback (most recent call last):
File "main.py", line 4, in <module>
print(average([]))
File "main.py", line 2, in average
return sum(nums) / len(nums)
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero def average(nums):+ if not nums:+ return 0.0 return sum(nums) / len(nums) print(average([]))0.0Verified here means the empty-list case no longer crashes. Whether returning 0.0 is the right behaviour for your program is still your call.
The original code failed, and the fixed version then ran without errors.
The fixed version still failed. You see that failure, not a confident claim.
The original ran cleanly, so there was nothing to verify against. APReason says so.
If the sandbox itself fails, it is reported as a runner issue, never as a bug in your code.
Debugging rarely follows one line. Open a branch from any part of an answer to dig into a single suspected cause, then return to the main investigation where you left it. Learn how branching works, or see every hypothesis on a visual thought map.
One session covers a whole answer's run-and-verify attempts.
Yes, for supported languages. When you share broken code, APReason runs it in a hosted sandbox to capture the real error, then runs the proposed fix.
It means the original code failed and the fixed code then ran without errors, under the tested conditions. It does not prove the fix is correct for every input or that all intended behaviour is preserved.
Python, JavaScript and TypeScript (run with Node.js). Compiled languages such as C++, Rust and Go are not executed today.
JavaScript and TypeScript runs stop after 20 seconds. Long-running jobs, servers and code that needs live outside services are not a good fit for the sandbox.
Yes. Up to 8 extra files (such as helper modules or sample data) can be placed next to the code before it runs, within your plan's context limit.
Code you share is sent to our AI and sandbox providers to be analysed and run, and is stored with your conversation. See our Privacy Policy for details. Privacy Policy.
Yes. Free accounts get 1 debugging session per day. One session covers a whole answer's run-and-verify attempts.